M.R. James said that sex had no place in a ghost story. But was he right? This episode we attempt to answer this question and more, as we cover The Nature of the Evidence by May Sinclair, a tale from 1923 about a couple who just want to enjoy their wedding night. Is that too much to ask? Apparently, yes.
Thanks to Debbie Wedge for providing the readings for this episode, and donāt forget to check out Ghostly Encounters, the haunting free interactive event that Debbie is helping organise in Oxford on the 20th April 2024.
Show notes:
- The Nature of the Evidence by May Sinclair (gutenberg.org)
This story, along with the others from May Sinclairās Uncanny Stories can be read in full at Project Gutenberg. - May Sinclair (maysinclairsociety.com)
Sinclair had a fascinating life. You can see a shortish biography of her here (or go big and read Suzanne Raitt’s 2000 biography). - āSome Remarks on Ghost Storiesā by M.R. James (berfrois.com)
M.R. James made his feelings on sex in ghost stories abundantly clear in this article published in The Bookman in 1929. - āGhosts, Treat Them Gentlyā by M.R. James (mrjamesarchive.wordpress.com)
James returned to the subject of sex in ghost stories a few years later in this article he wrote for the Evening News in April 1931. TLDR: still not a fan. - The Idealism and Pantheism of May Sinclair (Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast)
This story is steeped in the concepts of Idealism, a school of philosophical thought for which May Sinclair was passionate advocate.
- Matrimonial Causes Act, 1923 (womenslegallandmarks.com)
This story touches on the thorny issue of divorce in the United Kingdom in the 1920s. In the same year this story was published, a landmark piece of legislation was passed that leveled the playing field between women and men in the area of divorce. - The Lipstick Revolution of the 1920s (britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk)
The character of Pauline in this story seems to reflect a sea-change in attitudes towards female beauty during this period, characterised by growing social acceptability of wearing lipstick. In this story it carries a hint of Paulineās self-expression and sexual freedom. - St. Paul on sex and marriage (mit.edu)
Paulineās name may be inspired by the words of St. Paul, who had some choice things to say on the matter of sex, marriage and in particular unmarried women who ācannot control themselvesā! - Stages of (Victorian Mourning) and Fifty Shades of Purple (lilacandbombazine.wordpress.com)
Pauline should have probably realised that Marston was not yet over the death of his first wife when she finds that their marital bedroom is decorated almost complete in purple, the traditional colour of extended mourning. - The Lost Ancient Practice of Communal Sleeping (bbc.com)
The fact that Marston and Pauline have separate bedrooms may seem strange to modern sensibilities, but for a long time it was the norm for a husband and wife to sleep in separate beds. Only after the 1950ās did it begin to be regarded as a sign that something was wrong in a marriage. - The Victorian Cult of Child Innocence (psychlit271.blogspot.com)
Marstonās seeming obsession with the āchildlike innocenceā of his young bride Rosamund reflects Victorian attitudes towards children and the preservation of their āinnocentā state. Well, the children of the upper classes anyway. The children of the poor were not regarded quite so delicately!Ā - May Sinclair and Psychology (maysinclairsociety.com)
The psychoanalysis of Freud and Jung was another huge influence on May. In February 1923, Sinclair delivered a speech to the Aristotelian Society that’s highly suggestive of this story: did Marston and Rosamund’s desire elevate them all the way to May’s “Ultimate Consciousness”?
- āWe tried to have sex with ghosts and hereās what happenedā (buzzfeed.com)
Is having sex with ghosts a real thing? Absolutely not. But admit it, you still want to click the link to the above Buzzfeed article, donāt you? Go on, we wonāt tell anyone. - Blue Juice (imdb.com)
It would be deeply remiss of us if we didnāt point out the similarities between this story and the 1995 British comedy/surfing movie Blue Juice, with Catherine Zeta-Jones and Sean Pertwee (although Marston probably wishes he was in Ghost).
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
I think that M. R. James was asexual all of his life.
“He’s become a sex bore!”
I literally laughed out loud. Excellent work as always, chaps.
To me this story came off as totally psychological. This is a (rather good) story about grief, and Marston descending into this chasm of guilt personified by visions of his dead wife. He needs the vision of Rosamund to justify his feelings betrayal in “sealing the deal” his cold rational self won’t otherwise allow. However, Pauline’s experiences in accidentally groping a scary boob make this purely psychological approach a problem, but you MIGHT be able to put down to some kind of shared psychosis?
But then Marston goes off has cosmic euphoria sex with his ghost wife and throws all that out the window! I will say though, I felt that ending was delivered almost like a Lovecraft story, just the way Marston is talking. He’s seen beyond he LIKES IT.
As for James and his remarks, I think by “sex” he means romance and overt physical passions having an intrusive presence in a story. Apart from being The Arch-Victorian, he had a pretty hardline aesthetic when it came to his genre fiction. He had a formula. He liked absolute focus, everything must serve the vision, and I’d say that did him pretty well as a writer. He’s not completely wrong about sex and so on in genre fiction, some writers do insert romantic subplots (Hollywood is still doing it!) that can drag down a narrative, but he was also rather Victorian about it, which is to be expected.
I can’t think of a single MR James story that would have been improved by a sex scene. However, I suspect it would be very amusing to read a sex scene written by Monty! I think such matters were of very little interest to him. He would have regarded them as a distraction in his life let alone his stories!
Was it just women that Monty was disinterested in? Maybe, but we can compare and contrast with comparable stories written by a gay author at the time. Read through E F Benson and I can see the similarities and the differences.
Could this be what inspired ‘Blithe Spirit’ the Red Harrison film implies some form of sexy contact between the deceased wife Elvira and Rex Harrison. As for the story personally I enjoyed it with everything implied it didn’t become lurid – hardly ‘The entity’ territory.
Strongly agree with Sean (above) that MRJ’s comments about “sex” refer to what we would currently describe as “romance”. It seems like a usage familiar from other writers in the first couple decades of the 20th.
One of my grad school friend’s professor was a _bit odd_, including the belief that his house was haunted by the ghost of a Jazz Age dandy, and they were boinking regularly. Fortunately, the professor’s partner was understanding (or so I gathered). So this kind of thing is maybe more widespread than we assume! For all the torrents of paranormal media these days, it doesn’t seem to get much attention.
As my first wife would tell you, angrily. Pauline is a diminutive of Paula, which is the feminine of Paul.
See also Paulette/Pauletta/Paolina
Just thought I’d drop by to wish everyone — our quiet hosts, and fellow listeners — HAPPY HALLOWEEN! Hope you’re all well!
It seems our hosts have deserted us.
I haven’t given up yet. Given the premise of the podcast, a shocking recrudescence of something dusty and half-forgotten at some point in the future isn’t all that unreasonable to hope for!
To be fair, they’ve readily admitted in the past they’re not the most constant, and that they take the time they need so as to deliver a good podcast and not get burnt out with work and their lives. They don’t make money from this, it’s a hobby.
I’ve followed APTTC from the beginning. An eight month gap (so far) between episodes is unusual.
Iād love to hear from them again too! Hope all is well, you two. Love hearing you discuss spooky stories.
By the way, this story is available at Project Gutenberg in Sinclair’s collection “Uncanny Stories.” I believe it’s in the public domain in countries with life+70 copyright. I enjoyed the rest of the collection too.
Oops, I see this was already noted in the show notes, my mistake.
No worries, it’s a good collection and worth the attention, I agree š
Getting out in the high nineties would be a terrible shame for a podcast as good and well produced as this.
Hope all is well with the hosts and that they can yet make it to the century via a flashing cover drive!